I think you reversed the names on the labs.
The "named" lab seems to require extended acl commands
and vice versa
-wbl
This morning you woke up in a cell feeling dizzy and nauseous, it appears you were kidnapped by a mixture of agents from federal agencies. Your task is to finish this security test, if you pass you might end up becoming their next security agent...with blurry eyes you start your task!

You need to register to be able to download the GNS3 Topology File. (Registration is Free!)
I think you reversed the names on the labs.
The "named" lab seems to require extended acl commands
and vice versa
-wbl
Hi wbl,
It's OK. The only difference with the named access-list is how to configure it, you still need to choose a standard or extended access-list.
The named access-list lab is similar to this one with different tasks.
Rene
Hi Rene,
At first, I read this task incorrectly:
....FBI's L1 interface is only allowed (HTTPS)
After watching your video, I understand want was actually needed.
But now, I am wondering how would I block all traffic (besides 443) from loopback-1 (if that was the task)? Is it possible on the same router?
I basically created the same extended-access-list, and applied it to all of the interfaces of FBI -- but nothing will block traffic from loopback-1.
Here is the access-list from the running-config:
access-list 120 permit tcp 22.22.22.20 0.0.0.3 33.33.33.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443 log
access-list 120 deny ip 22.22.22.20 0.0.0.3 any log
access-list 120 permit ip any any
Thanks Rene. Love your website. Makes real practice fun and easy.
Hello Mark,
If I get your question right, you are trying to block traffic from Loopback1 on router FBI right?
Your access-list looks fine but you need to keep in mind that there's a big difference between traffic "created by your router" (locally originated) VS traffic that is flowing through your router.
Traffic that is locally originated by your router will NOT hit the access-list, only traffic that is flowing THROUGH the router.
If you want to test this access-list, you should replace the loopback interface for another router, you'll see that you will get another result ![]()
Was this helpful?
Rene
Rene,
Thank you for clarifying that for me.