Are the goals below the topology an error? It looks like they belong to another lab ![]()
BGP Route Reflectors and Clusters
Scenario:
As the senior network engineer for a large international company you are always trying to optimize your network and get the most out of your time. The network has a lot of IBGP routers and you got sick of configuring all those neighbor peerings. To fix this you configured the network with some route reflectors...this has saved you a lot of work but you want to take it one step further by clustering the network.
Goal:
- All IP addresses have been preconfigured for you. You don't see them in the topology picture or it would look like a picasso painting.
- Each router has a loopback0 interface.
- All routers belong to AS 1.
- Configure router Tilburg as the route-reflector for router Amsterdam and Utrecht. Use cluster-ID 1.1.1.1.
- Configure router NewYork as the route-reflector for router LosAngeles and Boston. Use cluster-ID 4.4.4.4.
- Configure router Hamburg as the route-reflector for router Dusseldorf and Berlin. Use cluster-ID 7.7.7.7
- Configure router Tilburg,Newyork and Hamburg with the correct IBGP neighbor peerings.
- Advertise all loopback0 interfaces in BGP.
- Ensure you have full reachability within AS 1. All loopback0 interfaces should be reachable.
IOS:
c3640-jk9o3s-mz.124-16.bin
Topology:

Video Solution:
You need to register to download the GNS3 Topology File. (Registration is Free!)
- Related Articles
Comments (7)
-
runelind 2011-10-10 18:13:20
-
ReneMolenaar 2011-10-11 11:46:53Hi Mattias,
The goals are ok. what do you think is confusing?

Rene
-
jlashari 2011-10-13 18:01:48Do you have solution for this lab?
-
ReneMolenaar 2011-10-14 00:55:30I don't have the final configuration for this one yet. In a few weeks i'm back to recording everything. If you are stuck on some part please leave a comment here or at the forum, I'll answer it ok?
-
binaryops 2012-01-10 06:19:55When I try and load this topology, it says that the device Boston is non-existent. Is anyone else having the same problem? I've tried removing and re-adding multiple times and the same results everytime.
-
ReneMolenaar 2012-01-10 14:45:28I just opened it on my PC and it's working here. Is anyone else having issues with this one? I can vaguely recall that I edited this topology after creating it, maybe there's something wrong with it.
If others have the same issue I'll recreate it.
-
rodion 2012-04-18 04:22:12Hello Rene,
there is mistake in configuration for LosAngeles FastEthernet1/0:>>ip address 192.168.46.4 255.255.255.0
it should have ip address from 192.168.56.0/24 network





